CapitalGuardAI-agent security licensesBuy

Scanner comparison

CapitalGuard vs Generic Code Scanners

Why AI-agent exposure review is different from ordinary code bug scanning, dependency scanning, or static analysis.

CapitalGuard fit

Teams worried about what coding agents can read, edit, run, summarize, and expose.

Generic code scanners fit

Teams looking for known vulnerability patterns, dependency issues, and code-quality defects.

Price frame

CapitalGuard sells the agent-exposure review as a fixed license instead of another broad scanner seat.

Decision matrix

Compare by first purchase, output, and next step.

Criteria
CapitalGuard
Generic code scanners
Risk model
Focuses on dangerous files, prompts, workflows, secret exposure patterns, and agent permissions.
Focuses on known code bugs, dependency issues, or generalized static findings.
Report language
Explains how an AI agent could expose the issue and what business impact follows.
Often describes technical defects without agent-specific exposure context.
Prevention output
Policy starter, safe-use checklist, and firewall-style guardrail installer.
Usually leaves policy and agent workflow controls to the buyer.

Recommendation

Buy the license when the repo scope is clear.

Use the first CapitalGuard report to decide whether the buyer needs more scans, support, monitoring, or deeper manual work. The first purchase should clarify scope, not create subscription drag.

Starter, Growth, and Pro checkout links are live.
No repository scan starts without ownership or written authorization.
Reports redact sensitive values and explain safe prevention controls.